On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:09:45 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not > be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now > should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error > reporting should not itself require the struct mutex) we can kill the > incomplete and misleading attempt at protection. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
So, when am I getting hangcheck resets on Ironlake? Hmm? But yeah, this was a hack during initial bringup of GEM and I'll be glad to see it go away... once you rebase so it doesn't conflict.
pgpVq8hin3dS5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
