On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:41:02 -0700, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:09:45 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: > > This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not > > be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now > > should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error > > reporting should not itself require the struct mutex) we can kill the > > incomplete and misleading attempt at protection. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > So, when am I getting hangcheck resets on Ironlake? Hmm?
I suppose you'll want a more sophisticated watchdog using GPU timers, as well ;-) Yes, we should sort out the reset bits for ILK and the rest. -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
