Hey Levi, I certainly would not want to push through the door a low quality solution, I would never do that, but I have been working on this project myself for a year and each time I come back, having addressed the concerns of the last batch of opinions there are a whole new set of concerns. It is indeed part of the problem with a project such as this, there is no "head" to make a decision, only numerous opinions, none of which come to a consensus.
Perhaps it is an aspect of the medium of using email for this purpose but it really goes in every direction at once very quickly and nothing is really ever "decided," it's quite frustrating. In the end, I just want everyone to come to a consensus on what this should be and I will go and finish it and be done with it. The original property get/set RFC has been around for over 3 years and PHP is one of the few modern languages that does not have such a feature. > -----Original Message----- > From: Levi Morrison [mailto:morrison.l...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:27 PM > To: Clint Priest > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Propety Accessors v1.1 > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Clint Priest <cpri...@zerocue.com> wrote: > > I will come up with some way for people to vote on the issues at hand > > and we can cast our votes and be done with it, then I will finish the > > project and get it out the door. > > > > -Clint > > I very much appreciate your work in this area, Clint, but please, please do > not try to push this out the door. This is not how we need > PHP to be developed. > This is a highly useful feature and should not be taken lightly. Things > should be thought carefully and over a period by many people. > There can be others to pick up the work if you cannot sustain it over the > next few months. What we do not want or need is a new > feature that is pushed out the door too early. > > Levi Morrison -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
