If you need access to the methods in AProxifier then why does the anonymous
> class extend A, you should extend AProxifier as you would with any other
> class.
>
Because A has the behavior I want to extend?
An other example:
class A {...}
class B {...}
class Factory
{
protected function protectedMethod() {...}
function getA()
{
return new class extends A {.. call Factory::protectedMethod()? ..};
}
function getB()
{
return new class extends B {.. call Factory::protectedMethod()? ..};
}
}
This is possible and welcomed with closures.
I see it as useful for anonymous classes than it is for anonymous functions.
What do others you think about it?
