That's great! Thanks for the update! -Eric On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Tomas Matousek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The result so far is that it is able to dispatch a request to Rails and > send output to client. The shelveset I've just submitted implements static > file handling (so that static file requests are not dispatched to Rails). > > > > Tomas > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Mike Moore > *Sent:* Friday, October 17, 2008 2:06 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2 > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > There's quite a difference between a development environment like > ASP.NETthat's fully supported by Microsoft and one that we make available on > an > as-is basis for the community to play with – and maybe take ownership of. > Our goal has always been to create a fully conformant Ruby implementation, > and by definition, that's going to be able to run Rails. > > Sure, but the word before was that any ability to run Rails with IronRuby > was not going to come from Microsoft and would have to be provided by the > community. This looks to be coming directly from Microsoft. You could have > left it alone and made us proxy from IIS to webrick/mongrel or use FastCGI, > but this is evidence of the IronRuby team going above and beyond. You are to > be commended. > > > > I would like to hear more chatter about this though. What are the results > of your experiments with IronRails so far? > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >
_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
