On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tomas Matousek <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I think having the V2 build there but not actively tested works fine. Anybody > who wants to use the latest IPy 3.0 build on V2 could submit a patch that > fixes v2 specific issues if there are any. > What about "officially" declaring we don't support V2 but keep the > infrastructure in place and not intentionally remove v2 specific code. Sounds > good?
Sounds good to me. I hate to invoke the "It's OSS; if you want it, you do it" rule, but this seems like an appropriate place to do so. - Jeff _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
