Is it time to implement this change, regarding the imaginary constant ii?
Note: I have no suggestions for improving the star notation of non-standard
analysis, mentioned in the last paragraph.
> On 19 Nov 2016, at 19:48, Makarius <makar...@sketis.net> wrote:
> Here is also the point in history where the slightly odd const name "ii"
> was originally introduced, oddly together with the same "ii" as notation:
> Here the notation was changed to the current \<i>, without changing the
> const name: http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/67a628beb981#l3.25
> Facts are usually just called i_foo_bar instead of ii_foo_bar. So an
> obvious reform after the Isabelle2016-1 release is this:
> * rename const "ii" to "imaginary_unit" (with existing syntax \<i>);
> the const name hardly ever shows up in applications
> * standardize all corresponding fact names towards i_foo_bar
> In principle, the const could be also called \<i> and the syntax
> removed. Morally it would probably mean to rename facts using that
> symbolic identifier instead of ASCII.
> Moreover, HOL/Nonstandard_Analysis/NSComplex.thy provides another odd
> const "iii" for "star_of \<i>". Maybe this could be improved after the
> release as well. Much of the "star" notation looks very old and could
> benefit from present-day notational facilities.
isabelle-dev mailing list