If you flatten the form all the field appearances will belong to the content
and can be printed. So, the answer is yes.
See the examples fdfmerge and field_merge. This code may help you to start:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04773.h
tml.

Best Regards,
Paulo Soares

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:38
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Anoter question concerning this problem would be as follows:
> 
> Consider that I have a collection of two or more readily made PDF
> documents
> with FDF fields filled with that and a SIGN field that is already signed.
> 
> The question would be: Is it possible, using the latest unofficial version
> of I-Text, to join these multiple documents in a way that all VISUAL data
> is preserved.
> This would mean that the data filled in the FDF fields would display when
> opening the combined document and that the visual properties of the signed
> SIGN field would display, so that this document can be printed. (f.ex the
> sign field contains some text about who has signed the document etc.). The
> sign field would NOT need to be functional just viewable.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas Byholm
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:         [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:         Monday, March 10, 2003 13:08
> > To:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:           [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110)
> >
> > Concerning the unofficial release of itext (itext-paulo-110) :
> >
> > Would the enhanced fdf parsing or the fixed pdf copy enable me to
> somehow
> > concatenate an FDF containing an adobe sign field, without loosing the
> > sing
> > field property, in a way that the document could be signed after the
> itext
> > has been generated? Or are there even improments in the form field
> >
>            CopyPdf will pass the fields as they are for the first document
> it
> finds with fields. It doesn't merge field from different documents.
> 
> > generation functions that would enable itext to generate the sign field
> by
> > itself? If not, could the new features in anyway help me in the quest
> for
> >
>            Well, any field type can be added with the right keys and the
> right
> dictionary but I know that's not the question. The last itext-paulo has
> support for the generation of sig fields but not for signing them. See
> signature.java in my site.
> 
> > adding a sign field or is this still a feature that could be introduced
> in
> > later versions of I-Text?
> >
>            Form field support is being improved. If you have suggestions
> for
> things that you would like I'm here to listen (linearization, transparency
> and document signing are not in my near goals).
> 
>            Best Regards,
>            Paulo Soares
> 
> > Regards,
> > Thomas Byholm
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> iText-questions mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> iText-questions mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions

Reply via email to