If you flatten the form all the field appearances will belong to the content and can be printed. So, the answer is yes. See the examples fdfmerge and field_merge. This code may help you to start: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04773.h tml.
Best Regards, Paulo Soares > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 14:38 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110) > > > > > Anoter question concerning this problem would be as follows: > > Consider that I have a collection of two or more readily made PDF > documents > with FDF fields filled with that and a SIGN field that is already signed. > > The question would be: Is it possible, using the latest unofficial version > of I-Text, to join these multiple documents in a way that all VISUAL data > is preserved. > This would mean that the data filled in the FDF fields would display when > opening the combined document and that the visual properties of the signed > SIGN field would display, so that this document can be printed. (f.ex the > sign field contains some text about who has signed the document etc.). The > sign field would NOT need to be functional just viewable. > > > Regards, > Thomas Byholm > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 13:08 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [iText-questions] Sign field ( itext-paulo-110) > > > > Concerning the unofficial release of itext (itext-paulo-110) : > > > > Would the enhanced fdf parsing or the fixed pdf copy enable me to > somehow > > concatenate an FDF containing an adobe sign field, without loosing the > > sing > > field property, in a way that the document could be signed after the > itext > > has been generated? Or are there even improments in the form field > > > CopyPdf will pass the fields as they are for the first document > it > finds with fields. It doesn't merge field from different documents. > > > generation functions that would enable itext to generate the sign field > by > > itself? If not, could the new features in anyway help me in the quest > for > > > Well, any field type can be added with the right keys and the > right > dictionary but I know that's not the question. The last itext-paulo has > support for the generation of sig fields but not for signing them. See > signature.java in my site. > > > adding a sign field or is this still a feature that could be introduced > in > > later versions of I-Text? > > > Form field support is being improved. If you have suggestions > for > things that you would like I'm here to listen (linearization, transparency > and document signing are not in my near goals). > > Best Regards, > Paulo Soares > > > Regards, > > Thomas Byholm > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > iText-questions mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > iText-questions mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
