Oops, didn't realize before that my configuration was broken; but then
again, I'm just a poor guy with only 1 350 ;-)

Any idea where these are coming from? Don't tknow if they are related
to the X-driver as well. They don't seem to cause any problems but
fill up my message-buffers:

ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d3c81c of 196608 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00102814, total 1255444
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d13824 of 458752 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x000d981c, total 1349660
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7cf5a60 of 786432 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x000bba58, total 1555032
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d05a60 of 720896 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x000cba58, total 1555032
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7ccfddc of 327680 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x00095dd4, total 941524
ivtv: OSD: DMA xfer from 0xb7d13824 of 458752 bytes failed with (-512)
offset = 0x000d981c, total 1349660

Otherwise the driver (0.3.2a) is running fine.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:17:41 -0000, John Harvey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No that's the way it works.
> This is X server code doing the work not our driver.
> 
> It did actually list it correctly for you in the line :-
> (WW) ivtvdev: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:2:10:0)
> found
> 
> What was happening before is that it was ignoring your busid because it was
> invalid.
> This is ok in single card mode but causes a problem in multi card mode. So
> people would get the 350 working with a broken configuration and the same
> for their normal driver but when they tried to merge them it would break
> horribly and then be really hard to debug.
> 
> If it continues to be a problem I could add some code to generate a new
> "correct" decimal version of the busid before passing it the the Xserver
> code.
> 
> John
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ivtv-devel-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Rosier
> > Sent: 20 December 2004 19:46
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] [X-Drviver] V0.7 xdriver source
> >
> > Sorry, fixed it. Started throwing different ID's at it. On a wild
> > guess I tried 2:10:0 and that worked. Is this a small bug? PCI probing
> > shows the busid in hex, putting it in hex in xorg.conf doesn't work
> > but gives an error in decimal for the correct busid.
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:42:15 +0100, Nick Rosier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > This is a snippit from my Xorg.0.log file:
> > >
> > > (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
> > > (II) PCI: Config type is 1
> > > (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x00000000, mode1Res1 = 0x80000000
> > > (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
> > > (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 10de,00e1 card 1695,100c rev a1 class 06,00,00
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 10de,00e0 card 1695,100c rev a2 class 06,01,00
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:01:1: chip 10de,00e4 card 1695,100c rev a1 class 0c,05,00
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 10de,00e7 card 1695,100c rev a1 class 0c,03,10
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:02:1: chip 10de,00e7 card 1695,100c rev a1 class 0c,03,10
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:02:2: chip 10de,00e8 card 1695,100c rev a2 class 0c,03,20
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:05:0: chip 10de,00df card 1695,100c rev a2 class 06,80,00
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 00:06:0: chip 10de,00ea card 1695,100b rev a1 class 04,01,00
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 00:08:0: chip 10de,00e5 card 1695,100c rev a2 class 01,01,8a
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 10de,00e3 card 1695,100c rev a2 class 01,01,85
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 00:0b:0: chip 10de,00e2 card 0000,0000 rev a2 class 06,04,00
> > hdr 01
> > > (II) PCI: 00:0e:0: chip 10de,00ed card 0000,0000 rev a2 class 06,04,00
> > hdr 01
> > > (II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1100 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1101 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1102 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 00:18:3: chip 1022,1103 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00
> > hdr 80
> > > (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 10de,0171 card 0000,0000 rev a3 class 03,00,00
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 02:06:0: chip 1106,3043 card 1186,1400 rev 06 class 02,00,00
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: 02:0a:0: chip 4444,0803 card 0070,4000 rev 01 class 04,00,00
> > hdr 00
> > > (II) PCI: End of PCI scan
> > >
> > > lspci gives:
> > >
> > > 0000:02:0a.0 Multimedia video controller: Internext Compression Inc
> > > iTVC15 MPEG-2 Encoder (rev 01)
> > >
> > > So the BusID for my card should be 02:0a:0
> > >
> > > Before, my BusID was "0x02:0x0a:0x00" and that worked fine. Now I set
> > > it to 2:0a:0 but I get this error:
> > >
> > > (WW) ivtvdev: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:2:10:0)
> > found
> > > (EE) No devices detected.
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > N.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:28:33 -0000, John Harvey
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Change
> > > >         BusID "0:0x08:0"
> > > >
> > > > To
> > > >         BusID "0:08:0"
> > > >
> > > > It has
> > > > Bus id's are decimal and should only contain digits and colons in the
> > id
> > > > part.
> > > > The x in the Busid causes the parser to error.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > ivtv-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to