Ah, very possibly true, that line is more of a hacked up status line
from the old original one, so really could just be redone, I haven't
looked at it too closely besides just generally seeing it kinda makes
sense in the messages still, but sounds like an oddity there which needs
to be changed most likely.
Thanks,
Chris
Bryan Mayland wrote:
What I was saying was that on line 96, s->buf_min isn't set, since the
initialization of the buffer limits starts right below that, doesn't
it? ivtv_stream_init() is only called from ivtv_stream_setup()
which is only called from ivtv_streams_setup(), which looks to only
happen when the card is first pci probed. I'm not all that familar
with the streams setup, but that's how it looks to me.
In either case, the value should be >> 10, since the printf says
"kbytes" but the value for both buf_min and buffers is in bytes, no?
Chris Kennedy wrote:
It's not allocated yet, just shows how much memory is allocated to
begin with, so when dynamic buffers are used (the default) that's
what it'll say.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
--
===
Chris Kennedy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
