On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:04:22PM +0100, Philip Rowlands wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >a) Ask people on ivtv-devel to consider switching to ivtv-users, and > > follow-up discussions pertaining to user content to the user > > list. Diverting threads is cumbersome and requires discipline. > > > >b) subscribe all back to the users' list and have the people > > interested in ivtv-development resubscribe to the emptied > > ivtv-devel > > > >c) merge the two lists to simply ivtv (e.g. drop ivtv-users and rename > > ivtv-devel to ivtv while moving the few users accounts over). > > > >d) leave it as it is > > > >Your vote? > > ivtv: In case of problems please include the debug info > ivtv: between the START INIT IVTV and END INIT IVTV lines when > ivtv: mailing the ivtv-devel mailinglist. > > I personally came straight to ivtv-devel because of that instruction. > Looking through the last month of ivtv-users, there seem to be a good > number of bug reports which probably belong on ivtv-devel, a few > unanswered queries, even fewer resolved issues. And spam. > > I'm quite happy with the list setup as-is, and would encourage > ivtv-users to come over here. Frequently Asked Questions are easily > dealt with, and the searchable history of questions with useful answers > is a valuable user resource whether they subscribe or not. > > Vote: c/d, preserving ivtv-devel because of the printk message.
In the long run (if trac's ticketing system is deemed to be of real benefit) this should be replaced with (a pointer to) instructions on how to submit a bug report. But still this is a very valid point, thanks for bringing it up! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpyzH558EDpK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
