> > Actually, those docs SHOULD be for James v2.1. The only ones > > that should be off-kilter are the javadocs. Are you seeing > > anything else that seems out of synch?
> Yes. That was the reason for the initial question... > For instance, http://james.apache.org/provided_matchers_2_1.html lists > "AttachmentFileNameIs" as a provided matcher Ah ... jumped the gun a bit on committing that change to the web site. There aren't a lot of those, as you can see from http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-james/src/xdocs/?sortby=date#dirlist. We're going to have to fix some of those names (and add some redirects) when we do the v2.2 release and update the web site. Putting versions in the URL means replication or other problems. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
