Something is getting lost in the translation --
When I say "directly" I mean directly from the file bytes into
a byte or integer array without first making an Image or a BufferedImage.
*Something* like this (and I know it doesn't exist so don't get excited)
int [] pixels = Toolkit.createPixelArray(fileBytes,...);
Something like that. Notice that I don't make an Image or BufferedImage
first. That's what I think would be a useful addition to the greater image
handling api.
Now to all those who are gnashing your teeth about why I don't want to
use BufferedImages -- take a valium and have a beer and a ciggy -- relax
and let me live in my own little world without BufferedImages.
Jim Graham wrote:
Hi Ken,
ImageI/O reads images into a BufferedImage which provides easy access to
a Java int/byte array with the pixels. Details of pixel access for
BufferedImage objects were discussed recently on this thread:
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=269294
...jim
Ken Warner wrote:
I think there is a hole in the greater Java API for working with images.
Images and BufferedImages are great if all you want to do is download
[stuff deleted]
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
