ok. Thanks. I won't bother you anymore about this issue. It looks like the 
proper way to do what I want is to use the Jess java api and create ordered 
facts from my map using the Fact class and assert them after the rules.clp file 
has been loaded instead of just storing the map from my java app. (I was 
looking to minimize the use of the java api when working with the rule engine, 
but this doesn't look too bad)

On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Ernest Friedman-Hill wrote:

> Java classes are totally optional in Jess -- in fact, templates and facts 
> created directly from the Jess language are always more efficient.
> 
> If Jess were to store the properties of an object in a Map -- so that they 
> were dynamic and extensible at runtime -- then it would be considerably 
> slower, for the same reason that fully dynamic languages in which objects are 
> maps of code and variables are slower than compiled languages. Construction 
> of a fast Rete network requires knowing what properties are being dealt with. 
> Think of a database in which all the data was stored as 
> object-attribute-value triples -- would it be as fast as a database with 
> fixed tables and columns?
> 
> 
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Donald Winston wrote:
> 
>> So I have to create a template and know all the identifiers before loading 
>> data into the fact base? This means I'll have to create java bean objects 
>> for all my data. Every time the data changes I'll have to modify the java 
>> classes. I don't believe in creating objects for things that have little or 
>> no behavior. That's what Maps and Lists  are for.
>> 
>> I suppose I could generate a "init-facts.clp" file when my app starts up and 
>> load it along with the rules.
>> 
>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Ernest Friedman-Hill wrote:
>> 
>>> Basically for the same reason that you can't say something like this in 
>>> Java:
>>> 
>>> String theMethodName = "toString";
>>> String myString = myObject.(theMethodName)();
>>> 
>>> but instead you have to use reflection to find the method "toString" and 
>>> call it using the Method object. The compiler needs to know the correct 
>>> template to use to compile the code, and it can't do that if the name of 
>>> the template is in a variable.
>>> 
>>> Now, you may ask *could* it work the way you want? Indeed, it could -- but 
>>> it doesn't at this time. We've talked in the past about allowing this kind 
>>> of thing, and it has its pros and cons.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Donald Winston wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Can anyone explain to me why this does not work? Why can't I use
>>>> 
>>>> (deffacts initial-facts
>>>> "Facts to trigger a few appropriate salient initialization rules."
>>>> (assert-request-parameters))
>>>> 
>>>> (defrule assert-request-parameters-rule
>>>> "Assert stored data one time."
>>>> (declare (salience 100))
>>>> ?x <- (assert-request-parameters)
>>>>      =>
>>>> (foreach ?key (((fetch request-parameter-map) keySet) iterator)
>>>>        (build str-cat "(assert (" ?key " " ((fetch request-parameter-map) 
>>>> get ?key) "))"))
>>>>         ; why not (assert (?key ((fetch request-parameter-map) get ?key))))
>>>>   (retract ?x))
>>>> 
>>>> (bind ?map (new java.util.HashMap))
>>>> (?map put one 1)
>>>> (?map put two 2)
>>>> (?map put three 3)
>>>> (store request-parameter-map ?map)
>>>> (reset)
>>>> (facts)
>>>> (run)
>>>> (facts)
>>>> 
>>>> Jess, the Rule Engine for the Java Platform
>>>> Copyright (C) 2008 Sandia Corporation
>>>> Jess Version 7.1p2 11/5/2008
>>>> 
>>>> This copy of Jess will expire in 207 day(s).
>>>> f-0   (MAIN::initial-fact)
>>>> f-1   (MAIN::assert-request-parameters)
>>>> For a total of 2 facts in module MAIN.
>>>> 
>>>> f-0   (MAIN::initial-fact)
>>>> For a total of 1 facts in module MAIN.
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> Ernest Friedman-Hill
>>> Informatics & Decision Sciences, Sandia National Laboratories
>>> PO Box 969, MS 9012, Livermore, CA 94550
>>> http://www.jessrules.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users y...@address.com'
>>> in the BODY of a message to majord...@sandia.gov, NOT to the list
>>> (use your own address!) List problems? Notify owner-jess-us...@sandia.gov.
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users y...@address.com'
>> in the BODY of a message to majord...@sandia.gov, NOT to the list
>> (use your own address!) List problems? Notify owner-jess-us...@sandia.gov.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Ernest Friedman-Hill
> Informatics & Decision Sciences          Phone: (925) 294-2154
> Sandia National Labs
> PO Box 969, MS 9012                            ejfr...@sandia.gov
> Livermore, CA 94550                             http://www.jessrules.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users y...@address.com'
> in the BODY of a message to majord...@sandia.gov, NOT to the list
> (use your own address!) List problems? Notify owner-jess-us...@sandia.gov.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 





--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users y...@address.com'
in the BODY of a message to majord...@sandia.gov, NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify owner-jess-us...@sandia.gov.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to