Hello, some XML Apis may optimize your XML and if a namespace already exists at the root-element, there is no need to define it in some element in the same context, except if the prefix changes. Maybe that is happening here.
Regards, Marko Voß -----Original Message----- From: vitomeuli [mailto:vitome...@libero.it] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:52 PM To: jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [jibx-users] Declaring xsi and xsd namespaces in both SOAP Envelope and Body content Hello Marko, Voß, Marko wrote: > > ... > It is strange, that those namespaces are missing in your XML, because your > binding is correct. I would guess, that some part of your APIs is removing > them after marshalling is done by JiBX. > I think this is the real point. In my interceptor, executing at the very end of the response generation process, after the JiBX marshalling I guess, I had some code to add such 2 namespaces to the <soap:Envelope>, root of the whole document. This works, they are where they are supposed to be. But the 2 namespaces are not in the contained XML element <OTA_HotelResNotifRS> mashalled from JiBX. -------- <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> <soap:Header> </soap:Header> <soap:Body> <OTA_HotelResNotifRS xmlns="http://www.opentravel.org/OTA/2003/05";> <Errors> <Error Type="1">Found 1 valid reservations with CRS Confirmation Number=52690IC0000172, there should be none.</Error> </Errors> </OTA_HotelResNotifRS> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope> -------- The other way round, if I remove that code, magically the 2 namespaces appear in the desiderd XML element <OTA_HotelResNotifRS>! -------- <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > <soap:Header> </soap:Header> <soap:Body> <OTA_HotelResNotifRS xmlns="http://www.opentravel.org/OTA/2003/05"; xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> <Errors> <Error Type="1">Found 1 valid reservations with CRS Confirmation Number=52690IC0000172, there should be none.</Error> </Errors> </OTA_HotelResNotifRS> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope> -------- So I think it is redundant to declare them twice, and some API (I don't know which one) builds the final XML (SOAP and everything) declaring them only once: they can be in the <soap:Envelope> root element, or in the contained XML element <OTA_HotelResNotifRS>, but not in both ones. I'm trying to argument this point with the support contact of the other company, I hope they accept my explanation. Many thanks! Cheers, Vito -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Declaring-xsi-and-xsd-namespaces-in-both-SOAP-Envelope-and-Body-content-tp32146703p32148618.html Sent from the jibx-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users ------------------------------------------------------- Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH. Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB 101892. Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt. Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
