I wonder why there would be an $.live with document as the only
interesting context.
Something like
$(document).zombi(selector, type, ...)
would be more flexible (I know, "zombi" is not nice, but I have no
inspirations about a more suitable name).
To avoid to repeat selector on multiple bindings, I suggest something
like:
$(document).make(selector)
.zombi(type, ...)
.zombi(type, ...)
An possible implementation of that: http://gist.github.com/227508
Maybe this is only a silly idea for majority of users (now), but I am
really of idea that this have even more sense then the current
$.fn.live.
On Nov 5, 2:44 am, xwisdom <xwis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wondering if version 1.4 will include improvements to live()
> events.
>
> See example
> here:http://www.zachleat.com/web/2009/05/08/performance-caveat-with-jquery...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
