How about $("#something").delegate(".thing","click", func).It almost makes too much sense :). On Nov 5, 6:31 pm, Robert Katić <robert.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder why there would be an $.live with document as the only > interesting context. > > Something like > > $(document).zombi(selector, type, ...) > > would be more flexible (I know, "zombi" is not nice, but I have no > inspirations about a more suitable name). > > To avoid to repeat selector on multiple bindings, I suggest something > like: > > $(document).make(selector) > .zombi(type, ...) > .zombi(type, ...) > > An possible implementation of that:http://gist.github.com/227508 > > Maybe this is only a silly idea for majority of users (now), but I am > really of idea that this have even more sense then the current > $.fn.live. > > On Nov 5, 2:44 am, xwisdom <xwis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > Just wondering if version 1.4 will include improvements to live() > > events. > > > See example > > here:http://www.zachleat.com/web/2009/05/08/performance-caveat-with-jquery... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
