On May 24, 1:23 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like he's maybe just picking on the competition, though jQuery > isn't exactly competition. Dojo is a really "heavy" framework compared > to jQuery and is better suited to a different type of application, > IMHO.
And that seemed to be his point at first. It was the switch from Dojo replaces flash (i.e. full featured and big), jQuery makes JS more usable to: jQuery is a nightmare to maintain; that really struck me as odd. I can not say I have ever used Dojo myself, mostly because of the file sizes involved to do even the most simple tasks. But from what I do know, it compares to jQuery like cars to trains, and I could not see how making unjustified claims benefits any party unless they are getting asked if one is an alternative to the other.
