hi, apologies the reason i didn't post in the UI group was because it was a method of jQuery itself, so I wasn't too sure which group to put it in to be honest! the thing is im unsure if its a problem with jQuery, I was just hoping someone might be able to see if there was a problem with the setup/ code or if someone had run into the same problem!
using jQuery 1.2.6 with an unkown version of UI as its only the minified version with no comments, it would be whicever version is compatible with 1.2.6. thanks, tom On Feb 6, 1:00 pm, "Richard D. Worth" <rdwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the future, please post questions about jQuery UI bugs to the jQuery UI > Dev list: > > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-ui-dev > > The list you've posted to is for general help with jQuery. Also, if you > could open a ticket in the jQuery UI bug tracker: > > http://dev.jqueryui.com/newticket(note: registration required) > > Please be sure to provide information about what version of jQuery and > jQuery UI you are using. If you can attach a minimal test page that shows > the error, that will help even more. Thanks. > > - Richard > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, tom gee <t...@obskure.org> wrote: > > > hi all, > > > this problem is driving me nuts! i hope to be able to provide as much > > info as possible to help resolve it!! the site is working fine with > > the drag n drop, but at some points the drag feature breaks reporting > > an error with line number 3370 (or there abouts as i have added a > > couple of lines to try n debug)...the line number points to this line > > of code... > > > offsetParent = elem.offsetParent, > > > it reports and error in IE with the script debugger...i have tried > > logging the elem to the console and it works fine, but for some reason > > it breaks when trying to get the offsetParent and ownerDocument from > > the draggable element. > > > any help would be most gratefully appreciated!!! i can supply a URL to > > view the issue...the site works fien in FF otherwise i'd be using > > firefbug to track down the problem...i can't seem to extract any more > > info than this really...! > > > again thanks in advance!! > > > tom
