lol, "trollish"


On Dec 3, 11:49 am, "Jonathan Vanherpe (T & T NV)" <jonat...@tnt.be>
wrote:
> I'm not trolling (at least today I'm not ;-)), but mootools' effects are
> smoother in at least some cases. I've switched to mootools for some
> websites just because of that, even though I really prefer working with
> jQuery.
>
> Try using scrollTo() diagonally in both frameworks to see one example
> (ofcourse, this might just be the scrollto plugin's fault).
>
> I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he has a
> point, IMHO.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> Rey Bango wrote:
> > LOL. :D
>
> > Thanks Scott.
>
> > Rey...
>
> > Scott Sauyet wrote:
> >> On Dec 3, 11:02 am, Rey Bango <r...@reybango.com> wrote:
> >>> I think you should consider looking into this yourself. The animations
> >>> provided by jQuery, while basic, are quite smooth and perform well. If
> >>> you feel that the ones provided by MooTools perform better, then I would
> >>> urge you to take the time to investigate it and consider offering
> >>> patches should you find a good solution.
>
> >> How does Rey do that?
>
> >> Twice I stopped my fingers over the "send" key on a "troll" message.
> >> I decided that ignoring it was my best bet.
>
> >> I never even considered trying to turn it into a positive suggestion.
>
> >> Sure, Rey, show us all up by being nicer! :-)
>
> >> -- Scott
>
> --
> Jonathan Vanherpe - Tallieu & Tallieu NV - jonat...@tnt.be

Reply via email to