lol, "trollish"
On Dec 3, 11:49 am, "Jonathan Vanherpe (T & T NV)" <jonat...@tnt.be> wrote: > I'm not trolling (at least today I'm not ;-)), but mootools' effects are > smoother in at least some cases. I've switched to mootools for some > websites just because of that, even though I really prefer working with > jQuery. > > Try using scrollTo() diagonally in both frameworks to see one example > (ofcourse, this might just be the scrollto plugin's fault). > > I refrained from replying because the OP seemed trollish, but he has a > point, IMHO. > > Jonathan > > > > Rey Bango wrote: > > LOL. :D > > > Thanks Scott. > > > Rey... > > > Scott Sauyet wrote: > >> On Dec 3, 11:02 am, Rey Bango <r...@reybango.com> wrote: > >>> I think you should consider looking into this yourself. The animations > >>> provided by jQuery, while basic, are quite smooth and perform well. If > >>> you feel that the ones provided by MooTools perform better, then I would > >>> urge you to take the time to investigate it and consider offering > >>> patches should you find a good solution. > > >> How does Rey do that? > > >> Twice I stopped my fingers over the "send" key on a "troll" message. > >> I decided that ignoring it was my best bet. > > >> I never even considered trying to turn it into a positive suggestion. > > >> Sure, Rey, show us all up by being nicer! :-) > > >> -- Scott > > -- > Jonathan Vanherpe - Tallieu & Tallieu NV - jonat...@tnt.be