Could time.at() be used to avoid all the extra sets? I think they both use seconds since Epoch. Unless it is timezone screwy?
-Tom On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Nick Sieger defenestrated me: > > This is a rather blunt instrument for now, but anyone have any > comments on the approach? See attached patch to JavaUtil. > --- testDateConversion.rb > require 'test/minirunit' > require 'java' > include_class ' java.util.Calendar' > cal = Calendar.getInstance > time = cal.getTime > test_ok time.kind_of?(Time) > test_equal cal.get(Calendar::YEAR), time.year > test_equal cal.get(Calendar::MONTH), time.month > test_equal cal.get(Calendar::DATE), time.day > test_equal cal.get(Calendar::HOUR_OF_DAY), time.hour > test_equal cal.get(Calendar::MINUTE), time.min > test_equal cal.get(Calendar::SECOND), time.sec > --- end testDateConversion.rb > /Nick -- + http://www.tc.umn.edu/~enebo +---- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----+ | Thomas E Enebo, Protagonist | "Luck favors the prepared | | | mind." -Louis Pasteur | ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
