Could time.at() be used to avoid all the extra sets? I think they
both use seconds since Epoch. Unless it is timezone screwy?
I can try it again, but I had problems getting Time to pick up the year/month/day when using epoch seconds. Or wait, it's seconds since the epoch? That well may be the issue -- I was probably handing it java's milliseconds since the epoch!
That would certainly simplify it if it works. I'll try that this weekend.
/Nick
