On Wednesday 10 May 2006 02:38 am, Charles O Nutter wrote: > Can anyone remember why we decided to use include_class instead of > import? It suddenly occurred to me today that import is both shorter > and more precise, since we're really importing a Java class into the > current namespace.
I suspect it was to be kind of like 'include Module', but I don't know why we would want that. > > There's probably a snowball's chance in hell we'll change it now, of > course We could make import an alias for it. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
