On Wednesday 10 May 2006 07:14 am, David Corbin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 May 2006 02:38 am, Charles O Nutter wrote:
> > Can anyone remember why we decided to use include_class instead of
> > import? It suddenly occurred to me today that import is both shorter
> > and more precise, since we're really importing a Java class into the
> > current namespace.
>
> I suspect it was to be kind of like 'include Module', but I don't know why
> we would want that.
>
On further reflection, it may be because we cannot import a package ("foo.*")
and thus creates less confusion.
> > There's probably a snowball's chance in hell we'll change it now, of
> > course
>
> We could make import an alias for it.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Jruby-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jruby-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
