On 11/07/2017 03:11 PM, John Meinel wrote: > ... > > > > Perhaps just: > > > > juju deploy --map-machines A=B,C=D > > > > ... or some variant of that? > > > > Let's use the betas to refine and condense and clarify. > > +1 to that. I'm wondering if use-existing-machines is ever appropriate > on its own, as the machine numbers in a model are ephemeral but > machine numbers in a bundle are static. > > > Feedback from Admins that one of their big use case really is for > bundle-a to lay down a definition/base charm across everything, and > bundle-b to be meant as an exact overlay, and all of the machine-ids > are exact matches. And having to specify 0=0,...50=50 is a lot of ugly > boilerplate.
I would expect that --map-machines means that machine numbers correspond UNLESS remapped. So your ugly boilerplate is not needed. Mark
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
