I'll keep my eye on it. Attila.
On 2007.12.07., at 9:24, Alex Tkachman wrote: > > Even even 4 but it is not exactly my question :) > I think it would be good if this implementation is aligned with > 'invokedynamic' if anything at all done in this direction. And would > like to know if it is the case. > > On Dec 7, 2007 11:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Alex Tkachman wrote: >>> Isn't it what famous 'invokedynamic' targets for? Could anybody >>> please >>> direct me to any development done in this direction? >> >> I think we may want an implementation that works on Java 5 and 6, >> yes? >> >> :) >> >> >> - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
