[kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

[Eric S. Raymond]

Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What I am trying to say is that if you can infer probable configuration
> categories that are relevant then instead of automatically filling the other
> areas in and blocking changing them without using vi you can put the other
> options as a submenu. That guides the less expert user and also helps rather
> than hinders the expert

OK, that's useful input.  Noted.

There's a bit of a technical problem with the distinction between 
derivations (which are like macros) and question symbols (which can
be suppressed or unsuppressed depending on their visibility predicate
But perhaps I can think up a solution to that one over lunch.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

You [should] not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will
convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it
would do and the harm it would cause if improperly administered
        -- Lyndon Johnson, former President of the U.S.

_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel