On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 18:05 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Ok, I think I've got it. Does this fix things? Ridiculous thinko...
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> index 9cd15e8..564ea14 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> @@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone(struct 
> acpi_thermal *tz)
>                       thermal_zone_device_register("acpitz", trips, tz,
>                                                    &acpi_thermal_zone_ops,
>                                                    0, 0, 0,
> -                                                  tz->polling_frequency);
> +                                                  tz->polling_frequency*100);
>       if (IS_ERR(tz->thermal_zone))
>               return -ENODEV;

Perhaps this is clearer?
It also makes cleans up a for loop with a naked ;

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
index 9cd15e8..e8a6490 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -883,6 +880,10 @@ static int acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone(struct 
acpi_thermal *tz)
        int result;
        acpi_status status;
        int i;
+       int tc1;
+       int tc2;
+       int passive_delay;
+       int polling_delay;
 
        if (tz->trips.critical.flags.valid)
                trips++;
@@ -894,22 +895,25 @@ static int acpi_thermal_register_thermal_zone(struct 
acpi_thermal *tz)
                trips++;
 
        for (i = 0; i < ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_ACTIVE &&
-                       tz->trips.active[i].flags.valid; i++, trips++);
+                   tz->trips.active[i].flags.valid; i++)
+               trips++;
 
-       if (tz->trips.passive.flags.valid)
-               tz->thermal_zone =
-                       thermal_zone_device_register("acpitz", trips, tz,
-                                                    &acpi_thermal_zone_ops,
-                                                    tz->trips.passive.tc1,
-                                                    tz->trips.passive.tc2,
-                                                    tz->trips.passive.tsp*100,
-                                                    tz->polling_frequency*100);
-       else
-               tz->thermal_zone =
-                       thermal_zone_device_register("acpitz", trips, tz,
-                                                    &acpi_thermal_zone_ops,
-                                                    0, 0, 0,
-                                                    tz->polling_frequency);
+       if (tz->trips.passive.flags.valid) {
+               tc1 = tz->trips.passive.tc1;
+               tc2 = tz->trips.passive.tc2;
+               passive_delay = tz->trips.passive.tsp * 100;
+       } else {
+               tc1 = 0;
+               tc2 = 0;
+               passive_delay = 0;
+       }
+       polling_delay = tz->polling_frequency * 100;
+
+       tz->thermal_zone =
+               thermal_zone_device_register("acpitz", trips, tz,
+                                            &acpi_thermal_zone_ops,
+                                            tc1, tc2, passive_delay,
+                                            polling_delay);
        if (IS_ERR(tz->thermal_zone))
                return -ENODEV;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to