On 31.10.2012, at 11:26, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 12:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> Hi Avi / Marcelo, >>>> >>>> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull. >>>> >>>> Headline changes are: >>>> >>>> * Fix 440 target >>>> * Fix uapi conflict >>> >>> Can you regenerate against queue branch? (btw i forgot to update >>> fsl_hcalls.h...). >> >> Hrm. So which branch am I supposed to base against? Master, next or queue? >> This one is against next... > > next and queue should be compatible (queue = next + a few patches). Are > there any conflicts when merging against queue? I merely want to know which one I should work against. So far I was under the impression that next is the one. Alex > > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
