On 10/31/2012 12:34 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 31.10.2012, at 11:26, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 10/31/2012 12:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 31.10.2012, at 02:32, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>>> Hi Avi / Marcelo, >>>>> >>>>> This is my current patch queue for ppc. Please pull. >>>>> >>>>> Headline changes are: >>>>> >>>>> * Fix 440 target >>>>> * Fix uapi conflict >>>> >>>> Can you regenerate against queue branch? (btw i forgot to update >>>> fsl_hcalls.h...). >>> >>> Hrm. So which branch am I supposed to base against? Master, next or queue? >>> This one is against next... >> >> next and queue should be compatible (queue = next + a few patches). Are >> there any conflicts when merging against queue? > > I merely want to know which one I should work against. So far I was under the > impression that next is the one.
It is. queue might be rebased at times. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
