On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Andras Timar <tima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps fully cloning projects (with suggestions and other stuff) would > be a > > valid feature request for Pootle? :) > > > Yes, it would. I wanted to clone last time, and I learned that it was > not possible. But I forgot this feature request and did not mention it > to Dwayne at LibOCon. I was convinced that maintaning two branches > with suggestions may be a pain for most of the teams. I think about > the stable branch as it is for fixing annoying translation bugs only, > and the newer branch is for the real work. If a team could not finish > 3.6.x translations by now, maybe it's time to go for 4.0 instead. So, > I would not mind, if cloning was possible, but I would give higher > priority to some other feature requests. What do others think? > I would ask anyway, but state it has lower priority for us. Worst case, it will just be an item on their wish list. And I think that after we finish with the 3.6.4 update, there's no point of continuing translation that branch, and focus should be moved completely to the 4.0 branch. Kaplan -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
