Den 01.06.2015 13:12, Andras Timar skreiv:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Kolbjørn Stuestøl
<kolbjo...@stuestoel.no> wrote:
It looks like the error function are reading < and > as XML tags.
The text "… new style of footnotes with <ref> and <references> tags that …"
is marked correctly as Invalid XML. (Unit #31209006). But they are not meant
to be XML tags. Here they are plain text.
Is it desirable to use < and > (or similar codes) instead of < and >
to avoid the error message?
IMHO it's easier to mark it as false positive in Pootle. There are
only a few of them in case of 'Invalid XML' check. Every string change
causes 100x work for 100x languages, not to mention engineer's time.
Regards,
Andras
You are right. I thought that < and > perhaps is a valid code for
< and > as in HTML.
Of course, there are more important tasks than this one.
(Sent copy to list too)
Kolbjoern
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
