Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Colombia defense minister looking to export security strategy and arms to
Central America

<http://www.laprensa.hn/mundo/americalatina/391609-96/colombia-promueve-en-latinoamerica-la-diplomacia-para-la-seguridad>

Last week Colombian Defense Minister Juan Carlos Pinzón
traveled<http://www.elcolombiano.com/BancoConocimiento/M/mindefensa_visitara_siete_paises_de_centroamerica_y_caribe/mindefensa_visitara_siete_paises_de_centroamerica_y_caribe.asp>
to
seven different Central American and Caribbean countries to discuss
security cooperation: Panama, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Jamaica,
the Dominican Republic and Trinidad and Tobago.

In every country Pinzón visited he discussed deals with the host
governments to increase defense cooperation with Colombia. These deals
included selling the countries arms and equipment, as well as having their
security forces trained by Colombian police officers and military personnel
to fight drug trafficking.

Colombian newspaper El
Tiempo<http://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/ARTICULO-WEB-NEW_NOTA_INTERIOR-13105572.html>
covered
Pinzón’s trip, focusing on this expansion of the Colombian security model
into Central America. According to the newspaper, the trip had three
focuses:
Advising on the implementation of Colombian models for the police, the
Armed Forces and defense sector sales;
Security cooperation so that [Colombian] national companies invest more in
[Central America]
Gaining support for the government’s decision regarding the maritime
dispute with Nicaragua.

*There were several other key points to highlight from the article:*

*Security reform and cooperation*
Colombia advises police reform in Honduras, Guatemala and the Dominican
Republic, but has agreements to reproduce a national model against drug
trafficking all over Central America, from Mexico to Panama.
Colombia hopes [that cooperation], for example from the various police
reforms in the region, will allow for shared protocols against crime.
According to Pinzón:

“We need to be in solidarity with these countries that are facing problems
similar to the ones we face. To the extent that this interrupts
trafficking, it interrupts criminality and reduces the flow of resources
that come to finance violence and terrorism in Colombia, so we all win.”

This idea has become popular in the region. Honduran Minister of Security
Arturo Corrales said,

“The idea is that Honduras will join a concert of friends that will widen
the spectrum against common enemies, and from the South to the North, and
will construct a bridge free of narcotrafficking and organized crime. For
this, we need Colombia.”

David Muguia Payes, the Salvadoran Defense Minister, also supported the
partnership, saying: “The Colombian experience is useful for us in the
head-on attack against criminals.” The Dominican Republic and Jamaica also
recognize Colombia as their primary ally in the fight against
narcotrafficking.
Pinzón also told the paper that it was a mistake for some Central American
countries to have reduced the sizes of their militaries after signing peace
accords, saying that this “opened up spaces for organized crime.”
On the issue of the country’s maritime territorial dispute with Nicaragua,
Pinzón said: “I found a lot of understanding for Colombia’s position to not
implement The Hague’s [November 2012] ruling.”

*Business interests:*

Colombian companies from various industries have invested all over Central
America. As El Tiempo noted, Colombia and its business community have one
of the highest rates of investment in the region. Some defense-focused
businesses, like armored cars and bulletproof clothing, are already widely
recognized.

Colombia hopes that these trainings and agreements will boost their
military- industrial complex and lead to the sale of ships, boats, guns,
pistols, rifles and gun sights.

Minister Pinzón is promoting Indumil and Cotecmar, two Colombian businesses
that have developed weapons such as the Cordoba pistol, the Galil ACE
rifle, as well as river and ocean patrol boats. The sale of one of these
boats, which 
cost<http://www.hoy.com.ec/noticias-ecuador/colombia-estrena-su-segundo-buque-patrullero-590120.html>
around
US$60 million to construct, is being negotiated with Trinidad and Tobago,
and Colombia has just closed a deal to sell river patrol boats to Brazil.

The article then goes on to discuss the expansion of Colombian banking
interests in Central America.

*Continuing a problematic trend*

Colombian training of foreign forces is not a new trend, but it is
accelerating one. As noted in our recent military trends
report<http://justf.org/files/pubs/0913_TimetoListen.pdf>,
an April PowerPoint slideshow from the Colombian Ministry of Defense shows
there were 9,983 recipients of Colombian training from 45 different
countries between 2010 and 2012. In Panama, Pinzón noted 4,000 police
agents alone have already been trained in Colombia. Between 2010 and 2012,
that number was just shy of 2,500.

Just the Facts’ Adam Isacson has
covered<http://justf.org/blog/2013/02/12/and-without-us-aid-colombias-training-other-security-forces-increases>
concerns
about the “export” of Colombia’s training model before – for one, Colombia
has yet to address the widespread human rights violations committed by
their own security forces, including 4,716 alleged extrajudicial killings
of civilians.

Another concern is the United States’ financial and diplomatic support for
this training. The United States pays for Colombia to carry out some part
of these trainings with funds from the Central American Regional Security
Initiative (CARSI). However, it is not known what the content of the
training courses covers, how much money the U.S. provides, or how many
foreign forces are trained with its financial backing.

The State Department’s Foreign Military Training Report, the annual report
that documents U.S. training of foreign forces, only documents recipients
trained directly by United States personnel and fails to include those
trained by Colombian personnel with funding from the United States.

For example, according to the
report<http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rls/rpt/fmtrpt/2013/index.htm> for
2012 that was just released, just
290<http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/213457.pdf> Honduran
police and military received training from the United States. This number
does not include, for example, Honduran police personnel trained by
Colombian police as part of the U.S.-backed Honduran police reform. For
Haiti, the U.S. government
reports<http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/213470.pdf> 20
trainees – this omits the
training<http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/06/05/3435882/colombia-us-help-train-haitian.html>
of
ten female Haitian police that were trained in Colombian earlier this year,
funded by the U.S. International Narcotics and Law Enforcement office.

With a reduced defense budget, having Colombia train some of these forces
with U.S. funding is a much cheaper option for the United States. As
Assistant Secretary of State for International Narcotics and Law
Enforcement Affairs *William Brownfield has
said<http://justf.org/blog/2013/06/24/seven-points-congress%E2%80%99-hearing-us-aid-central-america-and-caribbean>,
“It’s a dividend that we get for investing over $9 billion in support for
Plan Colombia**.”*

Going forward it is important to keep in mind what lessons are being
exported. Pinzón’s comment that reducing the size of militaries was “a
mistake” and linked to the rise in organized crime in Central America
is a *troubling
message for both human rights and civil military relations, and one that
the U.S. government does not necessarily share. It comes at a time when several
countries <http://justf.org/blog/2013/08/23/podcast-militaries-police> like
Honduras<http://justf.org/blog/2013/07/31/militarization-law-enforcement-honduras>
 and 
Guatemala<http://justf.org/blog/2013/07/24/militarization-law-enforcement-guatemala>
are
already militarizing their domestic law enforcement, which is happening with
some degree of U.S. funding and tacit approval.*

*CIP intern Ben Fagan drafted the translations included in this post*

http://justf.org/blog/2013/10/08/colombia-defense-minister-looking-export-security-strategy-and-arms-central-america?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JustTheFactsBlogs+%28Just+the+Facts+blogs%29
*
*

---------------------------------------

colombiareports.co/*rumors*-*emerge*-*peace*-*process*-*delayed*-*abandoned*
/
O
ct 8, 2013
 Rumors emerge that peace process could be delayed or abandonedposted by
Peter Bolton
 [image: Rumors emerge that peace process could be delayed or
abandoned]<http://colombiareports.co/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/santos_happy.jpg>

Juan Manuel Santos (Photo: President's Office)
[image: Share Button] <http://www.hupso.com/share/>
<http://www.hupso.com/share/add.php?service=twitter&title=Rumors%20emerge%20that%20peace%20process%20could%20be%20delayed%20or%20abandoned&url=http://colombiareports.co/rumors-emerge-peace-process-delayed-abandoned/><http://www.hupso.com/share/add.php?service=facebook&title=Rumors%20emerge%20that%20peace%20process%20could%20be%20delayed%20or%20abandoned&url=http://colombiareports.co/rumors-emerge-peace-process-delayed-abandoned/><http://www.hupso.com/share/add.php?service=googleplus&title=Rumors%20emerge%20that%20peace%20process%20could%20be%20delayed%20or%20abandoned&url=http://colombiareports.co/rumors-emerge-peace-process-delayed-abandoned/><http://www.hupso.com/share/add.php?service=linkedin&title=Rumors%20emerge%20that%20peace%20process%20could%20be%20delayed%20or%20abandoned&url=http://colombiareports.co/rumors-emerge-peace-process-delayed-abandoned/><http://www.hupso.com/share/add.php?service=stumbleupon&title=Rumors%20emerge%20that%20peace%20process%20could%20be%20delayed%20or%20abandoned&url=http://colombiareports.co/rumors-emerge-peace-process-delayed-abandoned/><http://www.hupso.com/share/add.php?service=reddit&title=Rumors%20emerge%20that%20peace%20process%20could%20be%20delayed%20or%20abandoned&url=http://colombiareports.co/rumors-emerge-peace-process-delayed-abandoned/>

Reports emerged on Tuesday that Colombia <http://colombiareports.co/>’s
President Juan Manuel
Santos<http://colombiareports.co/profile-juan-manuel-santos/> has
consulted with his political party, the “Party of the U,” about whether to
delay the peace talks with the country’s main rebel group
FARC<http://colombiareports.co/farc/> until
after the election, or even abandon the process entirely.

During the consultation, the president expressed his concern at the limited
progress that has been made so far in Havana, Cuba, since the peace talks
began in November 2012.

With only one of the five points of discussion – land reform – having been
agreed upon, it looks increasingly unlikely that the original deadline of
November 18, less than two months from now, will be met. It was hoped that
by this deadline an agreement would have been settled upon and be ready to
submit to Congress in time for the 2014 parliamentary and presidential
elections, set to take place in March and May respectively.

The president said: “People go asking, ‘well why not move? why not come to
an agreement? if there is a will, advance, the United Nations said it is
time for decisions, be brave, make decisions, I’m sure it’s worth it if the
prize is peace… let’s accelerate this process.”

*MORE:* Govt and FARC must reach peace agreement soon: UN
coordinator<http://colombiareports.co/un-coordinator-colombia-government-farc-must-reach-agreement-soon-cuba/>
*MORE:* Colombia’s chief negotiator urges FARC to accelerate peace
talks<http://colombiareports.co/colombias-chief-negotiator-urges-farc-accelerate-peace-talks/>

The November 18 deadline marks one year since the negotiations began in
Havana. The Colombian press is already raising the possibility that the
talks could fall through completely. El Espectador reported: “The query
raised by the U Party suggests that the government is already thinking
about a scenario in which the talks are abandoned.”

Although the President is still speaking in public in mostly encouraging
terms about the process, he has also expressed his worry that the public
are becoming increasing skeptical. He recently said: “We need to reach
agreements, we cannot continue indefinitely postponing decisions, because
otherwise the Colombian people will gradually increase their skepticism,
and that’s bad for the peace process.”

The FARC have also noted the slow progress, admitting that only “modest
achievements” have been made so far.

*MORE:* ‘Modest achievements’ so far in peace talks:
FARC<http://colombiareports.co/modest-achievements-far-peace-talks-farc/>

Sources


   - ¿Está Pensando El Presidente En Un Cese A Los Diálogos Con Las
Farc?<http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/paz/esta-pensando-el-presidente-un-cese-los-dialogos-farc-articulo-451237>
(El
   Espectador)
   - Santos Urge Nuevamente A Las Farc A Acelerar Proceso De
Paz<http://www.rcnradio.com/noticias/santos-urge-nuevamente-las-farc-acelerar-proceso-de-paz-94018>
(RNC
   Radio)

Reply via email to