moonshine
Thu, 2 Apr 1998 13:19:31 -0500
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Hi Mac, > She said the actions by Clinton were "boorish and offensive" but not > "outrageous." I beg to differ. If you believe an employer does precisely > what Clinton was accused of is not outrageous why not just say so, Mac. If they were true I would agree. As of right now there is no evidence that they are. > The bar is in hers and your minds. > Wrong again Terry. If you understand anything about law you know yourself that this statement of yours is asinine. There is a standard set and the evidence clearly shows that the claims made did not meet that standard. Your argument is shallow and not based infact nor logic. I thought that maybe by some of your previous post's that you had some understanding of law but I'm in serious doubt of that. > > > >If it was done at all > > Judge Wright made the decision based on the actions having taken place. It > was up to a jury to find the truth of the situation in a case of outrageous conduct. That was not the sole reason of her decision. If you take her decision as a whole she wasright on the money. > The question was whether it was an actionable tort. That is the criteria > she says was not met. Do you agree or not, Mac? I agree it was not met. I also believe it didn't happen the way Jones said it did. > Which law and facts? The question is a matter of judgment as to whether an > employer can expose himself himself to an employee and tell her to kiss his > penis. Judge Wright says in her opinion it is not sufficiently offensive to > be brought before a jury by a plaintiff asking compensation. Do you agree? The facts that were submitted to her and the state law of Arkansas. I do agree with the judge. > > > Certainly that's your privilege. But you haven't described what it is you > disagree with me about except that you know I am prejudiced. > Best, Terry I disagree with your whole analogy of this decision. I think your position on this isnot based on fact, law, nor logic. Therefore it must me based on your opinion only and that's fine. ...Mac > " Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues