moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi Mac,
> She said the actions by Clinton were "boorish and offensive" but not
> "outrageous." I beg to differ. If you believe an employer does precisely
> what Clinton was accused of is not outrageous why not just say so, Mac.
If they were true I would agree. As of right now there is no evidence that they are.
> The bar is in hers and your minds.
>
Wrong again Terry. If you understand anything about law you know yourself that this
statement of yours is asinine. There is a standard set and the evidence clearly shows
that
the claims made did not meet that standard. Your argument is shallow and not based
infact
nor logic. I thought that maybe by some of your previous post's that you had some
understanding of law but I'm in serious doubt of that.
>
>
> >If it was done at all
>
> Judge Wright made the decision based on the actions having taken place. It
> was up to a jury to find the truth of the situation in a case of outrageous conduct.
That was not the sole reason of her decision. If you take her decision as a whole she
wasright on the money.
> The question was whether it was an actionable tort. That is the criteria
> she says was not met. Do you agree or not, Mac?
I agree it was not met. I also believe it didn't happen the way Jones said it did.
> Which law and facts? The question is a matter of judgment as to whether an
> employer can expose himself himself to an employee and tell her to kiss his
> penis. Judge Wright says in her opinion it is not sufficiently offensive to
> be brought before a jury by a plaintiff asking compensation. Do you agree?
The facts that were submitted to her and the state law of Arkansas. I do agree with the
judge.
>
>
> Certainly that's your privilege. But you haven't described what it is you
> disagree with me about except that you know I am prejudiced.
> Best, Terry
I disagree with your whole analogy of this decision. I think your position on this
isnot
based on fact, law, nor logic. Therefore it must me based on your opinion only and
that's
fine.
...Mac
> "
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
