On Thu, 31 May 2012, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > As an application developer, I'm totally fine with the packaged > plugin approach, if distributions will package it. I can live both > with the extra call and the extra memory requirement -- and I > totally understand not wanting to burden every user of lcms2 with > the memory requirement.
The memory requirement described for the tables is trivial compared to the amount of memory required to perform other operations. I worry that plugins are more complex and pose more security issues. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
