Am 15.03.2016 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... >> >> That is fine. But then I _believe_ the geodes all use the same PATA >> companion chips, so we might really restrict them there too. Seeing the >> difference in size, it hardly matters. I just don't like to include dead >> code. > > Ok, your decision, which may be valid until proofed wrong; But why choose a > naming after a specific device (Alix) instead of keeping a ore generic naming?
Actually looking at the small benefits, let's just let the ALIX and WRAP sleep by disabling them in the compile settings. I will be fine compiling one for me if I need to, but then it is hardly worth the trouble. ET ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
