...there are more of us that are using WRAP/ALIX/Geode :-) Best regards Jorn ================================ On 15. mars 2016 18:03, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 15.03.2016 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > ... > >>> That is fine. But then I _believe_ the geodes all use the same PATA >>> companion chips, so we might really restrict them there too. Seeing the >>> difference in size, it hardly matters. I just don't like to include dead >>> code. >> Ok, your decision, which may be valid until proofed wrong; But why choose a >> naming after a specific device (Alix) instead of keeping a ore generic >> naming? > Actually looking at the small benefits, let's just let the ALIX and WRAP > sleep by disabling them in the compile settings. I will be fine > compiling one for me if I need to, but then it is hardly worth the trouble. > > ET > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 > > _______________________________________________ > leaf-devel mailing list > leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
