Hi KP Am 28.12.2015 um 20:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > > Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2015, 19:59:45 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> Am 28.12.2015 um 17:23 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >>> Am Mittwoch, 23. Dezember 2015, 15:30:53 schrieb Erich Titl: >>>> Hi Andrew >> >> ... >> >>> /lib/libuuid.so.1.3.0 and its symbolic links >>> >>> It is marked as an feature "for advanced users" and never has been enabled >>> in busybox, but as part of hdsupp.lrp, which means not having findfs in >>> busybox, does not allow a judgement if the code snippet in linuxrc is >>> used or not. >> If it is not included in busybox all this does not make much sense. It >> will just not work. > > Yes it will not work out-of-the-box as outlined by David, but it works if one > follows the wiki page- hopefully, I haven't checked myself...
It will not work at all unless you have findfs. >> >> So why clutter linuxrc with old and broken code? > > I do not consider it as broken code, until I'm proofed wrong. Unless you have findfs it will not work. > David invested some work to find a solution for a specific setup/problem: > > "On some systems with multiple disk devices it is not possible to guarantee > the order in which these are identified at boot time. The disk which starts > out > as /dev/sda might become /dev/sdb after a reboot." I _guess_ this is true if you add hardware. That would not surprise me. It might be true for USB based boot for different systems. > > As-Is it requires the user to rebuild initrd, which is painful, but we may > better improve this than to neglect a problem. It requires a different busybox. The current one does not provide findfs. It just puzzles me that nobody ever barfed about it. This makes me think it was never used. cheers ET ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
