On Mon 2022-11-14T23:44:54+0000 Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS hath writ: > The reason why the CIPM (for now) sticks to the requirement that > |UTC - UT1| be bounded is most probably the argument brought forward > by some people from ISO who say that, without explicit bound on > |UTC - UT1|, UTC had to change its name so that "polysemy" is avoided.
The funny part there is that UT1 does not mean what they think it means. -- Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
