For Pity's sake Fred, give it a rest! cheers, Chris
----- Original Message ---- > From: Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> > To: Licensing and other legal discussions. <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> > Sent: Thursday, 12 March, 2009 8:32:19 > Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License Telephone Debate > > Hi, > > SteveC wrote: > > In the past couple of license working group meetings we've been trying > > to figure out how to get more input from the community on everything > > without descending in to a free-for-all. > > Does that mean that what we've so far collected on the Wiki (and the > lists, and the co-ment site) is considered as having "descended" into a > "free-for-all" and thus by implication somehow worthless? (Still > struggling to see the negative in "free-for-all" but you seem to be > convinced that the license must not be discussed by "all".) > > You say that "issues should be raised on IRC"; does that mean that you > only want to discuss *additional* issues that are not yet on the Wiki, > or are you basically requesting that people copy+paste the Wiki pages > into IRC if they want to affirm the importance of these issues? Or is > this more of a psychological exercise where Joe Mapper is allowed to > speak his mind and be heard to make him happy (in which case it would be > ok for 10 people in a row to say the same thing). > > Has it occurred to the license working group that such a phone call will > naturally be dominated by native speakers of English? Is the signal you > are wanting to send something like "we're looking to implement a license > for the UK and the US only, and the rest may do what they please"? > > Bye > Frederik > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
