On 20 August 2010 18:21, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > In my eyes the ODbL and CT are part and parcel and I refer to both as "the > license change". I don't think that you can separate them.
Is that because you don't think people will swallow the CTs unless they are a package deal? > The reason is that ODbL is a license for databases, and what the individual > contributor contributes is not (or at least: not usually!) a database. I know what they are, but they don't have to be joined at the hip... _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
