On 17 April 2011 14:39, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: > Clearly this is not that big a problem for Apache contributors, why > should it be a big problem for OSM contributors (setting aside the > desire to import other data for which the contributor has no right to > sublicense)?
Apache has been a mature project for quite some time, what you should be asking instead is why did others go for GPL for their httpd. In any case this sort of clause is most common with projects like google map maker, In fact until recently this was a reason used to promote OSM, the fact that it didn't use the same terms as google map maker. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
