Matthew Burgess wrote: > Whilst I don't want to drag this discussion on for too long, I'm not sure I > follow this though. I'm sure some of the Glibc failures could be due to the > fact that those tests are testing for features that the host's kernel simply > doesn't support, so instead of the expected output/return value, they'll be > returning ENOSYS/EINVAL.
For me, some of the failures were seg faults. Is that a gcc problem, a glibc proper problem, a glibc test program problem, or a kernel problem? Is it worth taking to the glibc devs? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
