On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:06:39 -0800, Bryan Kadzban <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's the best setup; we'll have to make sure at each > glibc release (until the bug is fixed) that no new private-futex tests > are added. (That the sed is still equivalent to the patch.) It'd be > nice if the sed could take into account the context of each line, but I > believe that's rather difficult with sed. > > Anyone else have a preference? Given the relative complexity of Andrew's sed expression, and your concerns above, I'd rather we go with the patch. Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
