Matt Burgess wrote: > > On 2014-04-02 20:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I've been trying to figure out whether we need the lfs udev rules when >> transitioning to udev from systemd-211. >> >> What we have is >> 55-lfs.rules, >> 81-cdrom.rules, >> 83-cdrom-symlinks.rules, >> write_cd_rules, >> write_net_rules, and >> init-net-rules.sh >> >> I do think we need init-net-rules.sh and write_net_rules to get back to >> eth0, but I'm not sure if we need the others.
> I've not tried it but (the bottom of) > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ > mentions that one can just pass 'net.ifnames=0' on the kernel command > line to disable the network device renaming. That would, assuming it > has the intended effect, mean that we could drop a boot script and a > rules file...nice :-) For most cases (one net card), I think net.ifnames=0 would be fine, but the init-net-rules.sh seems to be more robust (e.g. laptops). We could also just drop eth? and go with the renaming rules. >> I don't know if we can ignore changing the group for ippp and isdn etc >> devices or not in 55-lfs.rules. > I think those should be in BLFS, if they're still required. That's a good point. We don't even have ppp any more in BLFS. Do we need the cdrom rules? That would appear to be a less frequent issue. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
