Shava, are you talking about this? http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/07/cyber-jihadists/
I was glib, to be sure, but I followed up by posting the entirety of your 500 word response to my 200 word post. Also, 2007. On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Shava Nerad <shav...@gmail.com> wrote: > /snark > > Why, take the positive spin. Think of it as proving the New Yorker's place > in this constellation. > > They can destroy Aaron Swartz' character in one article and use him now to > promote their project without a single qualm. > (once so > egregiously that even in this day of op/ed journalism, I got a retraction) > to maintain it, since who would understand the architecture and user needs > better? > > This proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, their journalistic integrity. > > /end snark > > Standard disclaimer: haven't spoken for Tor officially since 2007. But > geeeez. > > This seems special. Of course, I imagine it doesn't make a fig of > difference to the average observer, but it's stunning how bold obscurantist > things like this I can see make me wonder -- what richness am I just missing > in my environment daily for lack of awareness of the foxes that surround me? > > Yrs, > ---- > > Shava Nerad > shav...@gmail.com > > On May 16, 2013 10:01 AM, "Nadim Kobeissi" <na...@nadim.cc> wrote: >> >> The technical aspects aside, I find the fact that they're using Aaron >> Swartz as a marketing asset to be morally problematic. :/ >> >> >> NK >> >> >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Jacob Appelbaum <ja...@appelbaum.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> Sarah Lai Stirland: >>> > >>> > http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/05/strongbox-and-aaron-swartz.html >>> > >>> > >>> > http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/backissues/2013/05/strongbox-the-new-yorker-investigates.html >>> > >>> >>> Kevin Poulsen suggested I open issues on Github and I've been doing so >>> as 'ioerror' for the last few hours: >>> >>> https://github.com/deaddrop/deaddrop/issues >>> https://github.com/deaddrop/DeadDropDocs/issues >>> >>> Looking at the current deployment doesn't impress me much - I think >>> there is a lot of potential though... >>> >>> All the best, >>> Jacob >>> >>> -- >>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by >>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at >>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >> >> >> >> -- >> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by >> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > > > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
