I am not sure if the blow by blow news coverage is of interest to this
list, but I thought people might want another piece of info about
Snowden. 
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/hawaii-real-estate-agent-snowden-left-may-1

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Matt Johnson <railm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Raven, your analysis is interesting.
>
> I wonder why the Chinese would do anything to help him? I cannot see
> how the publicity would work to the PRC's advantage. I am sure they
> would work with him if he wanted to sell them docs, but that does not
> seem to be his game.
>
> Of course you are right, he does not have any safe choices now.
>
> --
> Matt Johnson
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Nadim Kobeissi <na...@nadim.cc> wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-06-09, at 8:40 PM, Raven Jiang CX <j...@stanford.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> He did work in the intelligence community so maybe he has a better idea 
>>> than us. My guess is that asylum in Iceland is ideal if everything worked 
>>> out, but he doesn't think it is strong enough to resist U.S. pressure.
>>>
>>> Hong Kong is stable and modern, so he is less likely to be killed or 
>>> kidnapped by local criminals on CIA payroll, and at the same time the 
>>> Chinese government is less likely to cooperate with the U.S. than most 
>>> other stable governments around the world.
>>>
>>> It's definitely a risky choice, but it's not like there is really any safe 
>>> ones. I think the gamble boils down to whether China sees more value in 
>>> trading him off for some other diplomatic concession or keep him safe as a 
>>> constant reminder of U.S. hypocrisy.
>>
>> Very intelligent analysis there as to why he picked Hong Kong.
>>
>> NK
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9 June 2013 17:17, Matt Johnson <railm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Snowden says he wants asylum in Iceland. Why not go there directly?
>>>
>>> Going to Hong Kong makes him vulnerable to accusations of working for the 
>>> PRC.
>>>
>>> None of that makes sense to me, but what do I know. I will watch, and learn.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Raven Jiang CX <j...@stanford.edu> wrote:
>>> > There is a strong resistance against Chinese strong-arming in Hong Kong,
>>> > plus I am not sure that it is actually in the interest of the Chinese
>>> > government to help the US do anything about this. I think you can make a
>>> > case for why it's a better choice, though it is definitely debatable.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 9 June 2013 15:10, Sheila Parks <sheilaruthpa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I agree with what you say about Hong Kong
>>> >>
>>> >> He does say he would like to end up in Iceland
>>> >>
>>> >> Wonder why he did not go there in the first place
>>> >>
>>> >> Such an immensely brave and honest person
>>> >>
>>> >> Sheila
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> At 06:04 PM 6/9/2013, you wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 06/09/2013 04:43 PM, Matt Johnson wrote:
>>> >>> > I have to say going to Hong Kong for free speech and safety seems like
>>> >>> > a very odd choice to me. What was he thinking?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Actually, and I think this is pointed out in either the video or an
>>> >>> article somewhere, Hong Kong doesn't generally suffer the speech
>>> >>> restrictions mainland China does. Sure, they aren't completely free but
>>> >>> protests and unpopular political speech happen quite frequently and are
>>> >>> generally well tolerated by the government.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Still, I have to wonder why he didn't go somewhere like Iceland. To me,
>>> >>> that would have been a no-brainer.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anthony
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Anthony Papillion
>>> >>> Phone:   1.918.533.9699
>>> >>> SIP:     sip:cajuntec...@iptel.org
>>> >>> iNum:    +883510008360912
>>> >>> XMPP:    cypherpun...@jit.si
>>> >>>
>>> >>> www.cajuntechie.org
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
>>> >>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
>>> >>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Sheila Parks, Ed.D.
>>> >> Founder
>>> >> Center for Hand-Counted Paper Ballots
>>> >> Watertown, MA  02472
>>> >> 617 744 6020
>>> >> DEMOCRACY IN OUR HANDS
>>> >> www.handcountedpaperballots.org
>>> >> she...@handcountedpaperballots.org
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
>>> >> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
>>> >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
>>> > emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
>>> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>> --
>>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by 
>>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>>
>>> --
>>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by 
>>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>
>> --
>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by 
>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing 
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to