-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014.09.30 18.01, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Hi Eleanor, I understand the logic of the argument, but are there > news stories about people being harmed in the field due > specifically (or mainly) to deniability of the software they are > using? (Or research on the topic, though I'm not sure how it could > be a falsifiable or reproducible.)
I don't have any field stories that I have permission to share, but yes, I've heard of specific incidents. More generally, it represents an utter lack of awareness on the part of developers for the security risk analysis choices faced by individuals actually at risk. E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAlQrJRoACgkQQwkE2RkM0wohJQD/crteV0ZMLmZe5cbuNUgYrw45 FZYX657kGhcl0sYmfQMA/2YD3SBHWyqThFjWuF8xuhAh7BkQwEo3ouNchdAbBtml =2qRF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
