On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:05 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> > It would be simply wonderful to re-use the libxslt code (that we
> > already ship) for the XSLT filter. I wonder if you might be interested
..
> I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like
> WordprocessorML) use XSLT 2.0, which is not supported by libxslt (wasn't
> supported the last time I looked, at least).
Grief; XSLT is such a disaster area (and google trending below
COBOL) ;-)
> So either we throw out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0
> filters and declare that we only support XSLT 1.0 or we're stuck
> with saxon (and java).
Sigh; perhaps what we really want is to write the flat-XML stuff in
native C++ - surely it can't be -that- difficult ? /me knows nothing of
the code flow, but the existing XSLT there seems ~trivial.
Fridrich ? can we turn that into some easy hack ?
Hmm,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
