On 26/11/10 09:05, David Tardon wrote: > I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like > WordprocessorML) use XSLT 2.0, which is not supported by libxslt (wasn't > supported the last time I looked, at least). So either we throw > out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0 filters and declare that we > only support XSLT 1.0 or we're stuck with saxon (and java). > Just throwing an idea out ...
There's a lexer/parser project called Antlr that creates either Java or C++ back ends. They may (or may not) already have an XSLT 2 parser etc. Is that worth investigating? If they've got it, it'll give us a tree "for free" that we'll then have to analyse ourselves. Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
